Fresh from the half-bakery
Feb. 16th, 2010 12:11 amIt's daft to try to model human thought processes by using computing terms. They're just not the same sorts of thing. Yet that doesn't stop me calling the state of having too many things to think about 'thrashing' and having it be a useful analogy.
And yet. I begin to wonder that as the bloody devices have actually started to become useful, rather than something that you could solder up, laboriously type in '10 PRINT "STEVE IS ACE"' or spend half an hour pissing about with a cassette recorder so the thing could go 'Splurp! Splurp! Splurp!' like a clock-radio having a danger wank, so we've quietly changed the way we arrange (in several senses) our lives to accommodate the way they work.
I seem to remember that we're changed by our tools, so this isn't entire news.
It would not surprise me to learn that there are those who base their people-management skills on what they've learned from LJ friends-list drama.
(Bad for-instance. I'm having trouble thinking about this. In the same way that I'm sure I read a piece about the way that the scientific method was hopelessly mired in western-european/judeo-christian thought processes.)
Perhaps I should attend to some DNS. Yes. That would be best.
And yet. I begin to wonder that as the bloody devices have actually started to become useful, rather than something that you could solder up, laboriously type in '10 PRINT "STEVE IS ACE"' or spend half an hour pissing about with a cassette recorder so the thing could go 'Splurp! Splurp! Splurp!' like a clock-radio having a danger wank, so we've quietly changed the way we arrange (in several senses) our lives to accommodate the way they work.
I seem to remember that we're changed by our tools, so this isn't entire news.
It would not surprise me to learn that there are those who base their people-management skills on what they've learned from LJ friends-list drama.
(Bad for-instance. I'm having trouble thinking about this. In the same way that I'm sure I read a piece about the way that the scientific method was hopelessly mired in western-european/judeo-christian thought processes.)
Perhaps I should attend to some DNS. Yes. That would be best.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 10:09 am (UTC)For instance, I remember reading the Lisa issue of Byte and just Not Getting It at all. Since I was coming from the soldering-and-CP/M direction, that method of interacting with a computer made no sense. Yet here we all, clicking in boxes and typing our brains via a UI that's got even less to do with offices and documents than ever.
Hm. I blame Unix.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 05:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 09:42 am (UTC)There's probably a sort of Turing-equivalence going on here. Any sufficiently complicated system will have a part which is suitable for drawing analogies with any real-world situation you care to name.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 11:58 am (UTC)Of course before psychology was invented people just thought in terms of biological juices or "humours", which in a way is more accurate, at least in principle anyway.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 01:07 pm (UTC)We should revive that.
Probably with a booth at Lincoln.
"The Doctor is raising accumulator pressure, before the next consultative venting".
no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 01:13 pm (UTC)http://www.amazon.com/Ingenious-Mechanisms-Designers-Inventors-Set/dp/0831110848
to get our analogical glands properly pressurised.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-16 01:59 pm (UTC)