Yesterday was mostly spent pottering about Chepstow with some unusual suspects and it all turned out utterly splendid. I wonder if the one-way-system pub crawl is a thing, and if not it should be.
Anyway.
Part of the gig was minding an assemblage of artfully constructed steampunkery in the castle. For reasons which I suspect the estimable
autopope of this parish could fulminate over for quite some time, several of the items were handguns of varying baroqueness.
While I was standing there, everyone who picked up one or other of the pistols peered down the barrel and worked the trigger.
I have a phrase for that sort of behaviour and it is fucking idiocy.
I think it is a problem created by a particular sort of smug, (English) (middle-class) type who consider all firearms icky and therefore won't have anything to do with any aspect of them. Indeed, after the n-th time I found myself cringing and looking for something to hide behind, I was moved to explain to some small Tarquin (or Bastian or whatever pre-teens are called these days) that perhaps it would be a good idea to keep the thing pointed at the floor and finger away from the trigger until he was sure the weapon had been made safe.
This resulted in the usual set of filthy looks. The useless tossers.
I am not, in the main, the sort of person who agrees with many of the aims of the NRA (US version), but their advice to parents is spot on.
In a similar area we find the gormless sods in the office who do the same peering-and-triggering with the nerf pistols lying about. I don't actually care that the fucking things are toys don't do that it's fucking stupid and by the way don't point the fucking thing at me because you will have a sense of humour failure when I wallop you with something.
Jesus.
It's just me, isn't it? I was the one who was taught gun-safety by my parents and so I have to put up with a legion of horrible horrible bastards who'll bang on for hours about the relative merits of MP5 over G36 over Glock something-or-other and actually they haven't a fucking clue what they're talking about because they're the same bloody people peering down the business-end of something they don't know the state of and working the trigger hopefully to find out.
The very next person who tries something like that near me is going to get a right fucking talking-to.
(The cringe-and-duck thing? I can't not do it. It's ingrained behaviour and really, I'm not about to stop doing it.)
Anyway.
Part of the gig was minding an assemblage of artfully constructed steampunkery in the castle. For reasons which I suspect the estimable
While I was standing there, everyone who picked up one or other of the pistols peered down the barrel and worked the trigger.
I have a phrase for that sort of behaviour and it is fucking idiocy.
I think it is a problem created by a particular sort of smug, (English) (middle-class) type who consider all firearms icky and therefore won't have anything to do with any aspect of them. Indeed, after the n-th time I found myself cringing and looking for something to hide behind, I was moved to explain to some small Tarquin (or Bastian or whatever pre-teens are called these days) that perhaps it would be a good idea to keep the thing pointed at the floor and finger away from the trigger until he was sure the weapon had been made safe.
This resulted in the usual set of filthy looks. The useless tossers.
I am not, in the main, the sort of person who agrees with many of the aims of the NRA (US version), but their advice to parents is spot on.
In a similar area we find the gormless sods in the office who do the same peering-and-triggering with the nerf pistols lying about. I don't actually care that the fucking things are toys don't do that it's fucking stupid and by the way don't point the fucking thing at me because you will have a sense of humour failure when I wallop you with something.
Jesus.
It's just me, isn't it? I was the one who was taught gun-safety by my parents and so I have to put up with a legion of horrible horrible bastards who'll bang on for hours about the relative merits of MP5 over G36 over Glock something-or-other and actually they haven't a fucking clue what they're talking about because they're the same bloody people peering down the business-end of something they don't know the state of and working the trigger hopefully to find out.
The very next person who tries something like that near me is going to get a right fucking talking-to.
(The cringe-and-duck thing? I can't not do it. It's ingrained behaviour and really, I'm not about to stop doing it.)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 07:52 pm (UTC)Some steampunk fellamechap rocked up with his own nerf gun to have a go and did exactly the barrel squint you described. He got a lecture from me so short and sharp (and including the words 'fool' and 'example to children') that he asked if I was as drill sergeant for a day job!
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:20 pm (UTC)I can't speak about other weapons, but then general drill for checking shotgun barrels is to break the weapon open, at which point you'll find nothing, or the spent shells will spring past your right ear. Because obviously no-one is mental enough to leave the blasted thing lying about with a pair of live shells in situ.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:21 pm (UTC)I have made this F-O because I fear some silly bugger might try to make this into something it's not.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:23 pm (UTC)(low fools tolerance values today.)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:24 pm (UTC)H
*until after a term the teacher ran off with someone else's wife, amid great scandal.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:26 pm (UTC)And also quite obviously, unless it's a break-barrel weapon, peering up the business end will avail you naught because it's bloody dark. Mind, since these people don't know quite what they're looking for...
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:28 pm (UTC)Or you could find the out-of-the-betacam version of the R. Budd Dwyer news conference. Which I really don't recommend.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:36 pm (UTC)[Anecdote]
Years ago, I'd gone off with Pa and the head gamekeeper[1] to a Game Fair. (http://www.gamefair.co.uk/) While pottering about, we met one of the gamekeeper's chums + small child in pushchair. Small child is waving a toy rifle at people. Small child proceeds to load the toy rifle with imaginary shells before pretending to shoot us. So you can start as young as you like with the appropriate training.
[/Anecdote]
[1] And there goes what little 'street' 'cred' I had left...
no subject
Date: 2012-05-20 10:54 pm (UTC)I fell off my seat and pretended to die.
Small child's face wore an expression of utter shock. Especially when I didn't get up for ages. I lay there just long enough for the 'Oh shit something has gone seriously wrong here' thought to form in small child's mind.
(It was a mostly empty bus, mind. I don't do things like that in front of toooo many people!)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 02:18 am (UTC)Yes, in principle they should have been more careful. In practice, though, they judged from context that these things were toys . . . and actually they were right. It's hard to say how many of them would have acted differently if it was a more plausible piece. Most of them, I'd hope, but you never can tell.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 06:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 08:12 am (UTC)Pulling the trigger would bring the hammer down on the cap in the firing position. There'd be an impressive bang and a cloud of pungent smoke. And - here comes the really good bit - the roll of caps would move forward so a fresh dot of explosive was positioned under the hammer. All done by springs and cogwheels. No batteries involved!
My parents always insisted that I must never point the gun at other people or myself (well, so much for or games of cops 'n' robbers), and I should NEVER look down the barrel. I remember remonstrating with them, "But nothing comes out of the barrel!" The danger area was at the other end, where the hammer came down on the caps, it always seemed to me.
But anyway. That was my earliest (and, indeed, only) tuition on firearms safety. And it's not like I've had occasion to handle guns much in my life, but on the odd occasions where I've touched a gun, I've instinctively - without even thinking about it - followed my parents' cap gun rules.
In other childhood safety memories, I remember my old infants' school headmistress, Miss Chew (it was almost too good to be true, but that was her real name) said we should always carry scissors in front of us, with the blades pointing inwards. That way, if we fell over, they wouldn't injure anyone. I can remember thinking, yes, but then we'd stab ourselves in the stomach! Even at the age of about seven I reckoned that I'd spotted the fatal flaw in that advice.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 08:49 am (UTC)I have since learned that no, even blanks aren't safe, and yes, even the most highly-trained people make mistakes and actors do get killed on film sets.
So, erm, I totally agree with you. The best gun safety is good training.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 08:55 am (UTC)Imagine a cross between Anne Widdecombe and Grandma in the Giles cartoons. That was her.
She was downright odd, and not in a nice way. She was grimly, aggressively odd, and she got worse with every term. Eventually she was eased out into retirement when her oddness became a little too extreme.
I remember telling my parents stories of some of her wild mood swings and bursts of scary illogic in the classroom. "Oh, yes," said my mum. "We always knew she was a bit like that."
Even at the time I thought, "And nobody did anything?" This teacher, steadily going mad in a possibly-threatening-the-children's-safety kind of way, and she was just allowed to continue? These days she'd have been OFSTED-ed out the door at a very early stage. But this was back in the early 1970s. Things were different then!
no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 08:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 09:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-21 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-22 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-22 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-06-26 03:51 am (UTC)But my basic point was that the glass floor section was likely subject to such over engineering that it was more safe than the regular floor. Similarly if some guns are on public display in a regular place I'm willing to bet that they've been so thoroughly checked that they're safer to fiddle with than any non gun bit of machinery you might care to handle.