The drugs don't work
Jul. 16th, 2009 01:47 pm... Or at least, they're just papering over the cracks, rather than actually fixing something.
However, if Serotonin theory doesn't hold up, does that mean the scare stories about MDMA leaching the stuff away are as reliable as the folklore about LSD and chromosome damage?
However, if Serotonin theory doesn't hold up, does that mean the scare stories about MDMA leaching the stuff away are as reliable as the folklore about LSD and chromosome damage?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 01:03 pm (UTC)Also there have not, to my knowledge, been any of the to be predicted midlife crises from hell / out of the fillum Blue Sunshine, or at least none that have been sufficiently identified and collated into "a thing".
(1) Their familiarity with experiental extreme joy seeming to rather over ride their supposedly frazzled happy wires. Which was always a sign that things might not be as supposed that was freely admitted to at the time.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 01:12 pm (UTC)To an extent, I don't much care how a drug is working, as long as it is. I don't really understand how ibuprofen gets rid of period pain, but if it works I'm going to take it.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 01:39 pm (UTC)Her analysis seems to be based on intellectual rather than empirical factors, but fundamentally we don't give people antipsychotics because we theorise about their brain chemistry, we do it because in practice it seems to solve certain problems they have. The theorising is secondary to that, and comes later. My own observations are of course only anecdotes, but the friends I have who've taken their meds have done far better than those who are in the habit of refusing to. The obvious explanation is that the drugs have a tendency to work, although of course there are other possibilities.
I don't remember reading MDMA concerns termed as "leaching away" anything. Concerns on theoretical grounds are reasonable, as long as you bear in mind any lack of solid evidence.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 02:07 pm (UTC)I was hit by post traumatic stress on top of being rather SpeSHUL™ as it was.
Combination of speSHUL™ and breakdown=a bit bonkers for a protracted period.
Beta blockers semi controlled the shakes and the panic-central but they did not change the fact that I was slowly descending into depression mode as well.
I asked for CBT and instead was offered SSRIs.
You know the rest...I spent 3 months dying inside on a drug that should NEVER have been prescribed to a Synaesthete and ended up with "DO NOT ADMINISTER SSRIs" on her medical record.
Doctors do not always recognise the difference between those who NEED to face their demons and those who need to be somatised. Since I am not one of the latter, the article speaks to me that essentially, when it comes to malaises of the mind, modern Science still has no real clue. They will cure cancer before they cure the manyfold subtleties of mental illness....
no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 02:37 pm (UTC)Ok, at this point in time it's what the medical field can do for people who can't seem to control panic or psychotic behavior, but it's a plaster bandage on a belly wound. All these kids taking drugs for 'attention disorders' and such need techniques, not mind altering chemicals!
Ok, off my soapbox. Thanks for posting that link. I sent it to my son (who's now 23 and willingly back on medication though against his wishes) and to my son-in-law, who also wavers back and forth as to how he feels about medicating himself.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 02:49 pm (UTC)That's the thing about Evidence Based Medicine, it does not matter a jot whether the theory behind it is Activated Water, Seratonin Level or Space Pixies. What matters and what is measured is "is this thing better or worse than a sugar pill and a pat on the head".
Certainly a theoretical underpinning helps at the drug design stage.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 05:57 pm (UTC)However, to my mind at least, what's much more likely is that they do "work" to the degree the tests show them to work but that the pop-science "seratonin makes you happy" explanation the original article criticises is to some degree wrong. I have no idea to what degree drug companies and researchers in the field believe that model -- my suspicion is "not at all".
Incoherent rambling follows
Date: 2009-07-16 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-16 10:15 pm (UTC)(Obviously everyone who went and had it large in the early 90s has a tiny Bobby Chariot hidden within their brain.)
Re: Incoherent rambling follows
Date: 2009-07-16 10:19 pm (UTC)Re: Incoherent rambling follows
Date: 2009-07-17 03:28 pm (UTC)Also, on reflection, there's other medical conditions where the symptoms rather than the cause are treated, yet nobody suggests we should throw away the pills we take for those...