How I wrote cat-piss man
Mar. 23rd, 2008 01:27 pm(This is probably not a con report, because I have no idea what one of those is and I'm of a mood to actively avoid finding out.)
Anyway. Eastercon.
Interesting.
It's obviously going to make no sense at all to you lot, largely because it made no sense at all to me, but after the first couple of days of panels it had been made very plain thatlarge small[1] wedges of fandom and most some[1] aspiring SF awfuls would be far happier if Teh Interbets, and by extension the likes of me, would just bugger off and cease to exist.
Weblogging is wrong, authors keeping websites is wrong, writing stuff and putting it on websites is wrong and will lead to the downfall of civilisation, the expiry of the market for short fiction is All My Fault and I should don sackcloth and ashes and be paraded in the streets in a cart pulled by Tim Berners-Lee as the editorial staff of Interzone lob fruit and anatomically impossible suggestions.
(I may exaggerate for the purposes of dramatic wossname, but only very slightly.)
Luckily
pnh and CDoctorow pitched up today to speak sensibly and at length, and of course the mood in that panel session was largely spod-positive, but I can't help wishing those chaps had been able to experience the luddism abroad elsewhere. Although, perhaps not. I guess because I'm new to this game, I'm not used to dealing with the attitudes of Ludd-Gang and it's all a bit of a shock to the system. They've been doing it for a while and for them it's the surly background jabbering of gaslamp-lighters considering their future.
Still, it did make me feel all punk rock and transgressive and everything.
(I'm also going to have to come back to this and rewrite it with shorter sentences so it sounds somewhat less spittle-flecked.)
[1] After some reflection, some beer, some more wandering around and some commentary here.
Anyway. Eastercon.
Interesting.
It's obviously going to make no sense at all to you lot, largely because it made no sense at all to me, but after the first couple of days of panels it had been made very plain that
Weblogging is wrong, authors keeping websites is wrong, writing stuff and putting it on websites is wrong and will lead to the downfall of civilisation, the expiry of the market for short fiction is All My Fault and I should don sackcloth and ashes and be paraded in the streets in a cart pulled by Tim Berners-Lee as the editorial staff of Interzone lob fruit and anatomically impossible suggestions.
(I may exaggerate for the purposes of dramatic wossname, but only very slightly.)
Luckily
Still, it did make me feel all punk rock and transgressive and everything.
(I'm also going to have to come back to this and rewrite it with shorter sentences so it sounds somewhat less spittle-flecked.)
[1] After some reflection, some beer, some more wandering around and some commentary here.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 01:36 pm (UTC)Did you get to spend any time with Patrick or Cory? Or were they swamped and crazy-busy?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 01:56 pm (UTC)Huzzah!
(And finish the bloody book!)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 02:19 pm (UTC)I suppose that one of the things a writer of SF should understand is how it feels to be a stranger in a strange land, by which I don't mean a used Heinlein paperback. (Or maybe I do.)
Usually one doesn't expect
the Fannish Inquisitionto get that feeling from inside fandom, though.no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 05:47 pm (UTC)Yes, remember: short, controlled bursts.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 09:01 pm (UTC)Well, that explain why I never actually saw you--we were at different conventions! I never heard any of this stuff; I just had a long series of conversations with people who have sensible things to say on these issues. (You would have particularly enjoyed listening to me, China Mieville, and Paul Cornell singing harmony over lunch. China was exceptionally vivid on the subject of writers who object to the trade in used books.)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 09:03 pm (UTC)(/is seriously considering applying for panels about CC licensing.)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 10:42 pm (UTC)I go to conventions infrequently nowadays, selecting the smaller cons with high concentration of friends (like Potlatch) or Worldcons where vast numbers of people will provide a festival-like atmosphere.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 11:19 pm (UTC)finish the sub book. each time I come across a really good comment on arocket about old Soviet wherewithal, I think "JHR FTW!"
no subject
Date: 2008-03-23 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 10:51 am (UTC)I think Ludd-Gang are more or less a subset of the Unpublished and one step away from Rejectomancy. I wished strongly for a 'citation needed' sign during the one panel, but I'm not entirely sure those there assembled would have got that joke.
You're right. I would.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 02:28 pm (UTC)The problem with this insecurity is that if amateur stuff really is as bad as old media types insist, then they have nothing to worry about, do they? Most people prefer to read proper books written by proper writers, and there really is no reason for these types to feel threataned at all. I certainly wouldn't compare myself to "real" SF writers for a moment; most amateur, internet based writers are just doing it for the pleasure of telling a story.
It's kind of sad that the sci-fi establishment feels this way though. Or that anyone can even claim to be "the sci-fi establishment".
no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 05:18 pm (UTC)UnwashedUnpublished, and their Entitlement Brat beliefs ;)no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 06:43 pm (UTC)I love science fiction.
I am not, never have been and never will be 'a fan'.
(I've probably read too much of the stuff to be 'a fan' these days.)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 07:31 pm (UTC)That's not a pointer to the main weblog, that's an index + commentary to the (SF) writing specific bits.
It's not 'the establishment' (or even an establishment) but a mob of daft sods who have some very odd and very fixed ideas about why they're not getting published and why us internet johnnies are queering the pitch.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 07:51 pm (UTC)However, the way I think it worked is that the set of people who broadly agree with the way that Messrs. Gaiman, Stross & Doctorow do their various things are going to turn up to the panels that include those chaps, weblog live from the back of the audience and generally be spod positive.
The other set of people are aspiring writers and therefore Interzone (et al) subscribers. Although they're the people Warren Ellis talked about, they firmly reject his heresy. They're the ones who'll turn up for panels on How To Get Published and (The lack of) UK Short Fiction Market and mither on to each other about how the internet's spoiled everything and bringing back New Worlds would Solve Things.
In exactly the same way that Trads are a bit thin on the ground at InFest.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 10:53 pm (UTC)It really was that flecked in spittle and green ink, ironically it read like the sort of thing you expect to find on Indymedia or some nutbag's blog rather than the Beeb or wherever.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-24 11:51 pm (UTC)Sturgeon's Law applies to the output of the BBC/Guardian/Desmond's Asian Babes meejah empire as much as it applies to W. Fred Boggis and his Talking Weblog live and direct from beautiful downtown Bedminster.
(Someone please start a weblog called that)
If the bloody Nathans would stop producing such utter arse and come up with something as useful and entertaining as bOing^2, then they might have a point.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 12:58 am (UTC)I'll top that- I've just started The Worst Blog In The World!
http://the-worst-blog-in-the-world.blogspot.com
How d'ya like that for crappy blogging, "old media"?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 01:11 am (UTC)[grin] Except for those blogs kept by Neil? Also, Charlie Stross was rather keen on Bruce Sterling's blog.
Apparently I was attending the wrong panels ... [grin] Or possibly drinking with the wrong people ...
Admittedly, without the interwebs, the world of slash writers might have got less of the oxygen of publicity, and might have had more trouble sharing their ideas ... [grin]
no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 08:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 08:44 am (UTC)We need him to be successful so the rest of us can become favor-currying toadies.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 08:56 am (UTC)I want him to become successful, but hope he doesn't end up with too many fangirls. Though, he probably will end up with too many fanboys like Charles Stross. ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 02:51 am (UTC)yes there are a v small proportion of short story writers and ancient fans who blame t'Interblog for the collapse and fall of the Roman Empire. But I think they're to be pitied (possibly a hug might help) more than mocked - like the MPA and RIAA, they're simply defending their own defunct business model, namely Becoming Stars via hard Copy. Soon enough they'll wither away, like socialism was meant to..
I had no idea you knew Lucy and Patrick. Small world huh...
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 07:06 am (UTC)Now, SeƱor Hirez, finish that book!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 09:51 am (UTC)I blame Viable (http://hirez.livejournal.com/164981.html) Paradise. (http://www.sff.net/paradise/)