Container drivers/Space Cowboy
Jul. 5th, 2007 07:55 pmI'm most of the way through an interesting history of the shipping container and its effects on trade, prices, globalisation and all that malarkey. Inspired by this, it seems to me that there's a deal of SF where the universe is assumed to run on a pre-Napoleonic basis, and that's likely a bit rubbish.
I mean, either you've still got big boys fireworks, which means little more than grown up slashdotters queueing for a go in Branson's sub-orbital pickle jar. Or you've got a handwave drive and it's business as usual for Hapag-Lloyd and Maersk, other than the truck drivers having to negotiate the picket lines of angry physicists outside the depot.
Assuming interplanetary trade or shipping isn't a ludicrous idea in the first place.
Hm. I think I've just re-invented Ken McLeod's 'Engines of light' books.
Best not do that.
I mean, either you've still got big boys fireworks, which means little more than grown up slashdotters queueing for a go in Branson's sub-orbital pickle jar. Or you've got a handwave drive and it's business as usual for Hapag-Lloyd and Maersk, other than the truck drivers having to negotiate the picket lines of angry physicists outside the depot.
Assuming interplanetary trade or shipping isn't a ludicrous idea in the first place.
Hm. I think I've just re-invented Ken McLeod's 'Engines of light' books.
Best not do that.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 07:00 pm (UTC)Best not do that."
That made me laugh like a drain.
I read "interesting history of the shipping container " and thought 'God that must be dull'. Then realised a recently finished a book on the Cod industry that was fascinating and I loved and that I should just shut up.
The Cod book probably wasn't as useful for SF though.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 07:26 pm (UTC)http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120199/
I guess the usual deal (see much of Cherryh or Elizabeth Moon) is to make inter-system travel economically possible but slow & difficult, so it's Just Like Sailing Ships. Then you can have pirates and adventurous travelling merchants and Hornblower In Spaaaace.
In other words, it takes a carefully-calibrated handwave drive to get the economics right. Handwave too quickly, and Alpha Centauri is just past Reading and there's no romance in it.
The question in my mind is (I'm just meandering now), what would be worth carrying over such distances ? It won't be raw materials or collectables or any kind of ragular industrial product, it'll be things that you really can't make in more than a couple of places in known space. Stuff so high-tech it takes GDP-sized investment to manufacture it at all.
Maybe chip fabs will continue to get more expensive, and interstellar trade will be powered by Intel and AMD ?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 07:52 pm (UTC)Anyway, to transport people, we're looking at Generation Boats or sleeper cells. Boats can take as long as they like, in that case.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 07:53 pm (UTC)I mean, look what it cost just to get a camper van to the Moon! And the price of kerosene has not been going down since then.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 08:05 pm (UTC)Hmm. I'll get back to you on that.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 08:26 pm (UTC)As covered by the splendid Jennifer Pelland here. (http://www.helixsf.com/archives/Apr07/fiction/Q4_pelland_mercytanks.htm) (Well worth the read.)
Tourism might work, but that requires the handwave drive. There's no point going somewhere for a holiday if it costs the GNP of your home planet to get you there and the only people you can show the slides to are the great-great grandchildren of the people from next door.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 08:40 pm (UTC)If there's no point in carting several thousand containers of scruttock flanges from one alleged planetary system to the next, then there'll be no pie-munching space trucker hunched over a copy of the Proxima Centauri Sun.
Even with a minimal-faff handwave drive, you're not going to bother stopping on planets that aren't pretty Earth-like, which (one fondly assumes) will have the sort of raw materials lying about to enable a shining young society to quickly create six-lane motorways, strip malls, drive through laser-gun shops and all the other signs of progress.
I suppose, were one really feeling charitable, one might consider a situation where you'd some Falklands-like useless tip of a place that was kept going out of pure bloody-mindedness. Even then, that falls into the trap of thinking of planets like countries, which is stupid and annoying.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 09:08 pm (UTC)They need more perspective. Compulsory readings of The Power Projector, say.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 09:22 pm (UTC)The Falklands are (I'm guessing here) worth hanging on to for some comparably indirect reason, probably something military & strategic. Ditto Gibraltar. Ditto all those Pacific islands during WWII.
Which is not to say that planets are like countries, but that the reasons for holding onto occupiable territory are potentially rather complicated second-order things. The details of fish law, or the range of the available bombers, may turn out to be the important variables, not the planets themselves.
Expecting there to be a simple reason may be a great mistake. If there is a reason, it will be a complicated one, one that only works in a complicated context that we have yet to imagine.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 10:07 pm (UTC)However, yes.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 10:10 pm (UTC)Which would be bad because the sods would work out where I was getting it all from...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 10:13 pm (UTC)It wasn't that long ago that one used to see the superstructure of wooden railway wagons in the corners of fields. Now that they've either rotted away or been thieved by preservationists, they've not been replaced with containers. Odd.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 10:21 pm (UTC)I don't know whether to think that if we found habitable land we'd just fill it up with people because that's what we do. There'd be bound to be some Puritans or Moonies who would jump at the chance.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-05 10:51 pm (UTC)Which I think means that (if we had relativistic ships at all) we might well see manned exploration, just Because.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 12:27 am (UTC)[rummages on bookshelf, finds]
it's How To Build A Future collected in Apostrophes & Apocalypses (http://www.amazon.com/Apostrophes-Apocalypses-Collection-Acclaimed-Writers/dp/0312850697/ref=sr_1_1/105-3240038-3252423?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1183681628&sr=8-1).
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 07:25 am (UTC)Interplanetary trade miles: is your zoidjam locally produced? on which planet are you offsetting your carbon/hyperspace fuel emmisions then?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 09:54 am (UTC)Contains the lines...
Cargo comes in TEU's
Rolling up, rolling down
A bloody great box, boys, filled with booze
To go rolling down the river.
Chorus
Rolling up, rolling down
We'll all get drunk in Bristol town
24 hours to turn around
To go rolling down the river.
Possibly needs an interplanetary re-write.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 10:30 am (UTC)Looking at the photos from here (http://limasite85.us/index.html) it seems like the US military were packaging radar gear in something very similarly-sized by the late sixties.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-06 11:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 07:30 am (UTC)All the romance is gone, I fear.