The jet-propelled rejection (ii)
May. 3rd, 2007 07:49 pmF&SF bounced the thing only slightly less quickly than the Interzone chaps, but there's a big pond in the way.
Is there a land speed record for this sort of thing? Would listening to early Husker Du help?
I don't wonder that this writing business isn't yet part of my reality, because I suspect I should care more. Or I'm just so tiresomely arrogant that... No. That would be really quite bad.
Is there a land speed record for this sort of thing? Would listening to early Husker Du help?
I don't wonder that this writing business isn't yet part of my reality, because I suspect I should care more. Or I'm just so tiresomely arrogant that... No. That would be really quite bad.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 06:53 pm (UTC)Over here, I'm getting them back before it's sunk in that they're even out.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 07:55 pm (UTC)I win at rejection speed!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:04 pm (UTC)I had no idea!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:09 pm (UTC)Would listening to early Husker Du help?
Maybe, if you want to just thrash about. If you want to wallow a bit more, go for some early Sugar instead. Y'can't beat those lyrics!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:09 pm (UTC)Now, speaking of caring too much, I really do have an assignment to hand in tomorrow. It is not supposed to take more than 20 min, but I've been fretting about it vastly in excess of that.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 10:00 pm (UTC)Writing for its own sake is what LJ's for, though even that's a performance for anybody with the wit to know it. And who isn't entirely self-absorbed. Although, if entirely self-absorbed, then why in public on the internet? Like, HELLO? [/Chiller]
Telling stories to other people, making stuff up down the pub, whatever... The way the system works in this reality is that you go buy the books in the shop.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 10:04 pm (UTC)Still, might as well start at the top. I'm sure the rumours that there's a top-level cabal of editors who circulate lists of wannabes who have yet to know their place and thus must not be given houseroom are entirely baseless.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 10:06 pm (UTC)Which is, I understand, reasonably standard and not without basis in fact.
Perhaps I should begin a story with something like "I was becoming used to waking up in a rich woman's body"?
Or then again, perhaps not.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 10:17 pm (UTC)Don't take my precioussess awaaaayyy!! I need to revise them, just one more time!
-Barbara
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 10:20 pm (UTC)-Barbara
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 11:36 pm (UTC)Perhaps I should begin a story with something like "I was becoming used to waking up in a rich woman's body"?
I would keep reading just to see if you could pull it off. However, I don't have hundreds of stories to get through.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-03 11:43 pm (UTC)I'll either use it or visit upon someone else.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-06 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-06 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-06 06:00 pm (UTC)