The clearly splendid types over at Lineout Records are giving away a(n) MP3 by the new model ELRmy (Yes, I read the NME in the 80s. I can handle it.) and it's very fine racket indeed. Howling guitars and lush production values. I am very much looking forward to seeing them in action on Friday night. (Is it sold out yet?)
Otherwise I've been having a wonder about that there fashion thing. The only sleeveless things you generally (for very small values of 'generally') see for blokes are g*th/metal t-shirts that have been hand-modified and wifebeater vests, and those are just underwear with an attitude problem. For the wimmins[1] everything comes in sleeveless (angle-grinders, pianos, sideboards with matching nests of tables. Everything.) as well as fully-sleeved. I can sort of vaguely see that in some sort of fashion-tradition manner, especially the 3/4 sleeved variant. I'd either be pushing the things up or pulling them down. Er. Probably. Were I given to wearing that sort of thing. Anyway.
However, it makes no sense at all for technical clothing. Either you want maximum wicking coverage and/or protection from the elements, or you don't. Gender presentation has bog-all to do with it. (Unless there's some complicated effect with sweat production in different areas that I wot not.) Yet blokes get the cap sleeves and the wimmins do without. Huh?
Wossatallabahtden, geezah?
[1] (c) YKW.
Otherwise I've been having a wonder about that there fashion thing. The only sleeveless things you generally (for very small values of 'generally') see for blokes are g*th/metal t-shirts that have been hand-modified and wifebeater vests, and those are just underwear with an attitude problem. For the wimmins[1] everything comes in sleeveless (angle-grinders, pianos, sideboards with matching nests of tables. Everything.) as well as fully-sleeved. I can sort of vaguely see that in some sort of fashion-tradition manner, especially the 3/4 sleeved variant. I'd either be pushing the things up or pulling them down. Er. Probably. Were I given to wearing that sort of thing. Anyway.
However, it makes no sense at all for technical clothing. Either you want maximum wicking coverage and/or protection from the elements, or you don't. Gender presentation has bog-all to do with it. (Unless there's some complicated effect with sweat production in different areas that I wot not.) Yet blokes get the cap sleeves and the wimmins do without. Huh?
Wossatallabahtden, geezah?
[1] (c) YKW.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:22 pm (UTC)You're probably right though. Perhaps it is just down to shielding the populace from the average blokey armpit.
Still seems odd, though. It seems to me that there's an expectation (modulo Assos) that women want/require/are allowed less covering.
Unless I'm seeing things that aren't there due to preconceptions.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 02:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 10:58 am (UTC)otherwise decathlon sells very cheap gym vests that look rather cool, in a 90s goth kinda way. I couldn't find it on the site, but i found this (http://www.decathlon.co.uk/EN/Product_arborescence/running/running/men-running-app/m-running-cloth/product_8021696/index.html)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 11:50 am (UTC)Besides, one wants to showcase the illusion of a dainty wrist for science.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 12:58 pm (UTC)Otherwise, I shall re-arrange my assumptions in re. gender (presentation) specific clothing.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 03:18 pm (UTC)The problem with it was that I got a *really* bad sunburn on my tricep area on one long ride, and ever since I've been searching for a long sleeved *light* cycling top that I can wear in the summer. I despise 3/4 length and cap sleeves, but I've got issues with my arms. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 09:22 pm (UTC)some people do appear to have rather lengthy armpit topiary which stands out particularly when the top is cut to ride right across the middle of it, pushing it out in all directions..
anyway, it means sleeveless is an alt-option and thus way cooler than proper clothes.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 10:33 pm (UTC)i rest my case.
:o)
sometimes with hair, less is more.