Use of the word 'mashup' outside of musical endeavour grates quite badly and makes the user look like the chaps holding their crotches in the relevant bank advert.
Yes, messrs. bOing^2 and allied webloggers, I'm looking at you. We'll have no 'getting down with it in a web2.0 stylee' round here, thank you very much.
(That's two mentions of Eclectic Kettle on my FL in a fortnight. That'll be one of them sign things, or yanno[1], coincidence.)
[1] Well done, Ms.
chiller.
Yes, messrs. bOing^2 and allied webloggers, I'm looking at you. We'll have no 'getting down with it in a web2.0 stylee' round here, thank you very much.
(That's two mentions of Eclectic Kettle on my FL in a fortnight. That'll be one of them sign things, or yanno[1], coincidence.)
[1] Well done, Ms.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 03:29 pm (UTC)Preach it, brother.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 03:51 pm (UTC)Hope the Easton Mashups don't grate.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 04:09 pm (UTC)Pie & mashup != what I'm on about. You'll know it when you see it.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 04:15 pm (UTC)Bah .. cynical about all this web 2.0 business ... seems like another opportunity for big business to mine information and 'suggest' more products you should buy. Then again I'm not a very technical fella.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 04:24 pm (UTC)True that. As usual, a lot of this malarkey is jolly fine if used for good. I rather like being able to buy specific s/h books on a whim. It's also good to beetle down the shop for a browse; you can't easily browse on a webshite, no matter what they call the tool you use.
On the other hand, I get a bit worried when Amazon email me going 'We notice you bought Uncle Fester's Guide To Making MDMA (I did), we think you'd be interested in (random list of books) OR GOING TO JAIL YOU DRUG-FREAK'
That would be bad.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 04:26 pm (UTC)The bracketry is pure Usenet, but you do have an infectious way with worms.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-19 07:54 pm (UTC)